<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shades Of Pelosi: Wexler Boosts Birth Control As Cost Cutter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://finkelblog.com/index.php/2009/01/26/shades-of-pelosi-wexler-boosts-birth-control-as-cost-cutter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://finkelblog.com/index.php/2009/01/26/shades-of-pelosi-wexler-boosts-birth-control-as-cost-cutter/</link>
	<description>Media Criticism and Conservative Thought From Mark Finkelstein</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:37:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://finkelblog.com/index.php/2009/01/26/shades-of-pelosi-wexler-boosts-birth-control-as-cost-cutter/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkelblog.com/?p=862#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I think you make a great point about declining birth rates.  That&#039;s why I suggested Pelosi &amp; Co. should read Mark Steyn&#039;s &quot;America Alone,&quot; which describes how declining birth rates in the West and Japan, and high birth rates in the Muslim world, threaten our civilization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you make a great point about declining birth rates.  That&#8217;s why I suggested Pelosi &#038; Co. should read Mark Steyn&#8217;s &#8220;America Alone,&#8221; which describes how declining birth rates in the West and Japan, and high birth rates in the Muslim world, threaten our civilization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://finkelblog.com/index.php/2009/01/26/shades-of-pelosi-wexler-boosts-birth-control-as-cost-cutter/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkelblog.com/?p=862#comment-76</guid>
		<description>It appears the left might be looking ahead to socialized medicine being implemented. One of the things going on with the &quot;stimulus&quot; bill that is getting no attention in the MSM is that all of our medical information (see link below) is going to be collected in a government database. It doesn&#039;t take a genius to understand what that information will eventually be used for, particularly when dealing with an aging population and the increasingly limited health care resources inherent with government-run health care.

However, lower birthrates mean a lower number of taxpayers down the road. Given the fact that the Baby Boomers are beginning to start retiring in earnest, is it a wise move for this nation to encourage far lower birth rates, particularly given the entitlement train wreck we are headed for as a nation? 

Lower birthrates haven&#039;t worked out all that well for the Europeans, who have allowed a great deal of immigration in order to bolster their shrinking native workforce. We all know what they are now dealing with because of it.

About the only benefit I can see is that it will make room for a mass influx of people who aren&#039;t from here. Surely that isn&#039;t what is behind this, is it? 

Whatever their motivation, it seems they will only accomplish placing a much higher tax burden on future generations, who are going to be overloaded even if things remain as they are.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=87322

-Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears the left might be looking ahead to socialized medicine being implemented. One of the things going on with the &#8220;stimulus&#8221; bill that is getting no attention in the MSM is that all of our medical information (see link below) is going to be collected in a government database. It doesn&#8217;t take a genius to understand what that information will eventually be used for, particularly when dealing with an aging population and the increasingly limited health care resources inherent with government-run health care.</p>
<p>However, lower birthrates mean a lower number of taxpayers down the road. Given the fact that the Baby Boomers are beginning to start retiring in earnest, is it a wise move for this nation to encourage far lower birth rates, particularly given the entitlement train wreck we are headed for as a nation? </p>
<p>Lower birthrates haven&#8217;t worked out all that well for the Europeans, who have allowed a great deal of immigration in order to bolster their shrinking native workforce. We all know what they are now dealing with because of it.</p>
<p>About the only benefit I can see is that it will make room for a mass influx of people who aren&#8217;t from here. Surely that isn&#8217;t what is behind this, is it? </p>
<p>Whatever their motivation, it seems they will only accomplish placing a much higher tax burden on future generations, who are going to be overloaded even if things remain as they are.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=87322" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=87322</a></p>
<p>-Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rantings and Ramblings From All Around.. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shades of Pelosi: Wexler Boosts Birth Control As Cost Cutter &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://finkelblog.com/index.php/2009/01/26/shades-of-pelosi-wexler-boosts-birth-control-as-cost-cutter/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Rantings and Ramblings From All Around.. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shades of Pelosi: Wexler Boosts Birth Control As Cost Cutter &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkelblog.com/?p=862#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] But I just heard a case made by Congressman Wexler that it was in the national interest that we have fewer kids! The moral imperative aside, someone should send Pelosi and Wexler copies of Mark Steyn ’s America Alone. &#8230;[Continue Reading] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But I just heard a case made by Congressman Wexler that it was in the national interest that we have fewer kids! The moral imperative aside, someone should send Pelosi and Wexler copies of Mark Steyn ’s America Alone. &#8230;[Continue Reading] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Un-Olbermann? Matthews Gives Republicans Reasonable Shake &#124; FinkelBlog</title>
		<link>http://finkelblog.com/index.php/2009/01/26/shades-of-pelosi-wexler-boosts-birth-control-as-cost-cutter/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Un-Olbermann? Matthews Gives Republicans Reasonable Shake &#124; FinkelBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkelblog.com/?p=862#comment-65</guid>
		<description>[...] that bad case of restless leg? The last couple Hardball episodes give reason to hope so. As I noted here, on yesterday&#8217;s show, Matthews took Dem congressman Bob Wexler to task for his defense [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that bad case of restless leg? The last couple Hardball episodes give reason to hope so. As I noted here, on yesterday&#8217;s show, Matthews took Dem congressman Bob Wexler to task for his defense [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: Dem Robert Wexler says abortion cuts costs - 1/26/09 &#124; Mofo Politics &#124; Hoping Obama fails</title>
		<link>http://finkelblog.com/index.php/2009/01/26/shades-of-pelosi-wexler-boosts-birth-control-as-cost-cutter/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: Dem Robert Wexler says abortion cuts costs - 1/26/09 &#124; Mofo Politics &#124; Hoping Obama fails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkelblog.com/?p=862#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] Finkelblog: ROBERT WEXLER: Let’s talk about that family planning. Family planning saves, if done correctly, an enormous sum of money down the road in the health care system. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Finkelblog: ROBERT WEXLER: Let’s talk about that family planning. Family planning saves, if done correctly, an enormous sum of money down the road in the health care system. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
