Palin Implies Letterman Potential Perv
Would you leave your 14-year old daughter alone with David Letterman? Sarah Palin’s not so sure. On this morning’s Today, after displaying the Palin statement shown in the screencap: “it would be wise to keep Willow away from David Letterman,” Matt Lauer had this question for the Alaska guv.
MATT LAUER: Are you suggesting that David Letterman can’t be trusted around a 14-year old girl?
SARAH PALIN: Hey, take it however you want to take it.
A bit later, Palin offered a more light-hearted possible interpretation.
PALIN: Hey, maybe he couldn’t be trusted because Willow’s had enough of this type of comment and Willow might want to react to him in a way that would maybe catch him off guard.
Hmm, feisty 14-year old Alaska girl versus cranky old Letterman? My money’s on Willow!
This was written by
Mark Finkelstein. Posted on
Friday, June 12, 2009, at 7:57 AM. Filed under
Uncategorized. Bookmark the
permalink. Follow comments here with the
RSS feed. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
[]
5 Comments
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it Lauer!
What part didn’t you understand in the first place…marshmallow head.
She should have asked him if he planned to ask Letterman if he was really implying that Palin’s daughter (whichever one) would have sex with A-Rod. That would be the equivalent of what he was asking her.
Until conservatives learn to shove it right back in the faces of these two-faced “journalists” they will be expected to take it.
that a-rod guy should also chime in here, maybe knock lecherman’s bottle opener over-bite down his throat. true justice.
Right, pappy, I wonder why no one’s asking A-Rod what he thinks of Letterman joking about him having sex with a teen…is he OK with that?
Yea, why should the Palin’s help him and his ratings?
I am surprised they even give Lauer the time of day.